IN-GAME TRADES 3: BREAK POINTS

IN-GAME TRADES 3: BREAK POINTS

Break points can be another possible entry point for in-game trading. Obviously, some players are better than others at doing so – amongst other qualities needed to be good at saving break points is mental strength, which some players have much more of than others.

In April 2013, I analysed the top 100 ATP and WTA players to assess which players were the best and worst at break points.

Interestingly the average percentage of break points saved in the ATP was 59.9%, but the average server in the sample won 62.7% of points, so the average break point was 2.8% more likely to be won by the receiver than any ‘normal’ point.


This was almost the same difference as the WTA. 56.1% of points were won on serve but only 53.8% of break points were saved, so the average break point was 2.3% more likely to be won by the receiver than any ‘normal’ point.

So clearly, if a player saves more break points than ‘normal’ points, they can be considered to have strong mental strength in this situation. In my opinion, it’s vital to compare break point save percentages to service won percentages to get this score, as opposed to purely looking at the player’s break point save percentages in isolation. If we were to do this, all the players at the top of the statistics would be the big servers, which would give us no edge because the market already expects them to win more service points than the average player.

Best ATP players at saving break points using the formula “Break Point Save Percentage minus Average Service Point Percentage” at the end of April 2013:-

(Mean is -2.8%)

Martin Klizan 4.1%
Jesse Levine 4.0%

Nikolay Davydenko 3.3%
Jeremy Chardy 2.7%

Tomas Berdych 2.6%
Radek Stepanek 2.4%

Feliciano Lopez 2.2%

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez 2.2%
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga 1.5%

Juan Martin Del Potro 1.4%
Rafael Nadal 1.1%

John Isner 1.1%

If we were to back these players, particularly the ‘non notorious’ big servers or non top-level players, such as Klizan, Levine, Chardy, Lopez and Garcia-Lopez, and perhaps the veterans

Davydenko and Stepanek too, we should have a positive expectation because there will be very few in the market that will anticipate that these players will be so good at saving break points against the average player

The worst ATP players using the same formula at end of April 2013:-

Andreas Seppi -5.1%
Sam Querrey -5.4%

Xavier Malisse -5.7%
Blaz Kavcic -5.9%

Tommy Haas -6.0%

Yen-Hsun Lu -6.0%
Florian Mayer -6.1%

Kei Nishikori -6.1%
James Blake -7.0%

Robin Haase -7.3%
David Nalbandian -7.3%

Go Soeda -8.4%
Alejandro Falla -8.7%

Michael Llodra -9.3%
Michael Russell -11.3%

Lukas Lacko -11.5%
Paolo Lorenzi -12.0%

Simone Bolelli -18.0%

Some of these figures are clearly horrific and are not from inconsiderable samples. Even if we focused on the very bad players, for example the ones with percentages worse than -7%, we would be able to find some great trading opportunities.

I also did the same research for the WTA.

Best WTA players at saving break points using the formula “Break Point Save Percentage minus Average Service Point Percentage” at the end of April 2013:-
(Mean is -2.3%)

Maria Teresa Torro-Flor 4.7%
Lauren Davis 3.9%

Flavia Pennetta 3.5%
Elena Vesnina 3.3%

Tamira Paszek 3.1%
Mandy Minella 3.0%

Camila Giorgi 2.8%
Karolina Pliskova 1.8%

Laura Robson 1.7%

As with the majority of the men’s players, there is no way that much of the market will anticipate these players at being good at saving break points. We definitely have an edge with this type of trade against the average player.


 The worst WTA players with the same formula at the end of April 2013:-

Sabine Lisicki -5.8%
Misaki Doi -5.9%

Ayumi Morita -6.0%
Shuai Peng -6.0%

Monica Niculescu -6.1%
Ana Ivanovic -6.2%

Maria Kirilenko -6.5%
Lourdes Dominguez Lino -6.5%

Daniela Hantuchova -7.0%
Stefanie Voegele -7.9%

There were two players worse than these but from a small sample, Vesna Dolonc (-11.0%) and Donna Vekic (-15.0%).

Of course, for balanced analysis, we also need to assess whether the receiving player is good at converting break points.

Obviously, as the mean for the ATP for saving break points was -2.8% compared to ‘normal points’, the mean for converting break points is 2.8% above the ‘normal point’.

Good ATP players at converting break points at the end of April 2013:-

Leonardo Mayer 12.8%
Michael Russell 11.2%

Jerzy Janowicz 8.0%
Ivan Dodig 7.0%
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez 6.7%

Fabio Fognini 6.7%
Jarkko Nieminen 6.4%

Tomas Berdych 6.0%
Martin Klizan 5.8%

Albert Ramos 5.8%
Dimitry Tursunov 5.7%

Nikolay Davydenko 5.6%

Philipp Kohlschreiber 5.6%
Aljaz Bedene 5.5%

Jurgen Melzer 5.5%

Interestingly, Klizan, Berdych, Davydenko and Garcia-Lopez also featured on the top players for saving break points as well. At this point it is clear that they should be players that you can rely on more in key points than the average player.

Bad ATP players at converting break points at the end of April 2013:-

John Isner -0.2%
Feliciano Lopez -0.4%

Go Soeda -0.4%
Roberto Bautista-Agut -0.5%

Bernard Tomic -0.7%
Tommy Haas -0.7%

Gilles Simon -1.0%
Joao Sousa -1.1%

Santiago Giraldo -1.1%
Benoit Paire -1.1%

Marcel Granollers -1.7%
Paolo Lorenzi -1.9%

Michael Llodra -2.1%
Victor Hanescu -2.1%

Tobias Kamke -2.6%
Ricardas Berankis -3.3%

Again, there are several names that feature in the list for players bad at converting break points and also for saving break points. We can therefore assume that Haas, Soeda, Llodra and Lorenzi are not as good at the key points as average points.

Good WTA players for converting break points at the end of April 2013:-

Yulia Putintseva 10.4%
Polona Hercog 10.3%

Aleksandra Wozniak 10.0%
Mandy Minella 7.4%

Bojana Jovanovski 6.0%
Sorana Cirstea 5.6%

Petra Martic 5.6%
Ayumi Morita 5.4%

Lucie Hradecka 5.1%
Maria-Teresa Torro-Flor 5.0%

Monica Niculescu 5.0%

Bad WTA players for converting break points at the end of April 2013:-

Maria Sharapova -0.6%
Camila Giorgi -0.7%
Jelena Jankovic -0.8%

Roberta Vinci -0.8%
Melinda Czink -0.8%

Su-Wei Hsieh -1.1%
Maria Kirilenko -1.1%

Annika Beck -1.4%
Anabel Medina Garrigues -1.9%
Donna Vekic -2.4%

Flavia Pennetta -3.0%
Ksenia Pervak -3.1%

Stefanie Voegele -3.3%
Lauren Davis -3.5%

Heather Watson -3.6%

Misaki Doi -4.2%

These stats should give you an overall insight about which players perform better than others in these key situations. It also should be very useful for you to be able to perform your own analysis for this in the future, if you want to keep these statistics up to date.

For me, trading break points is very simple. I stay in the trade until the game is either level at deuce or the game is won. As I won’t ever enter at 0-40 because the risk/reward ratio is very poor, and 15-40 is fairly borderline in this respect, usually I enter and exit within one point only (either 30-40 or 40-A and getting out at 40-40 or service break).

No comments